Thread: Nagi's Eyepatch?

When did Nagi get an Eyepatch and why does he have it?I have read these so sporadically I can not remember how he got it.

=_='........go read it again, this thread fails.

May I at least ask, how far back I should go back? I thought forums were for questions to be ask and theories to be conveyed, I guess I was wrong.

You are so true, mayb that's because you are a dumbass

Y'all are a couple of assholes, why don't you just answer his simple question instead of trying to rag on the guy/gal. Stop trying to fall into the bandwagon attitude of the regulars on this forum as a whole. I mean it is so much easier to simply answer the question than to come up with some snyde remark to try and fit into the ass mentality that so many "I think I'm big shit on the net" regulars have on this board. Plus this section has little traffic when compared to that of the Naruto and Bleach sections so threads like these have yet to become redundant and really trully have no reason to be policed at this time, to do so now is the act of an ass.


To answer your question, well sorta...
he had his eye gouged out and replaced with the eye of his father which retains... enough with spoiling...
start at the Feudal Japan Arc. which is after chapter 88 or so. So much has happened though, you really should read where you left off.

^ who is joining the bandwagon? o_o

he said he didnt read it sporadically, so i told him or her to read it again.
plus, how does this question alone really deserve its own thread? he or she could have asked it in another thread. after this question is answered, what else is there to discuss?

edit-
should i have answered this question too?

http://www.stoptazmo.com/showpost.ph...3&postcount=12

simply put, Nagi's eye got replaced with Sohaku's (which is supposed to let sohaku gain control of nagi's body. as to why otherwise, i dunno). i guess you can say his eye hasn't fully healed yet.

Originally Posted by vphamv

^ who is joining the bandwagon? o_o

he said he didnt read it sporadically, so i told him or her to read it again.
plus, how does this question alone really deserve its own thread? he or she could have asked it in another thread. after this question is answered, what else is there to discuss?

edit-
should i have answered this question too?

http://www.stoptazmo.com/showpost.ph...3&postcount=12

Firstly

You're joining the bandwagon because you said "this thread fails", something I know for a FACT you learned while viewing some other jackasses post, that statement was not original to you in any way, so yes, you are in fact doing something that has been deemed trendy on forums by asses.

Secondly and so forth...

I'm not taking the time to follow that link since I've already wasted so much typing to you, simply put you are an ass, most would think so, except for asses, so I'll leave that at that... a thread doesn't gain merit because it can be discussed endlessly, so STFU, boards are made for people to be able to discuss, state, ask and simply reply, there is nothing wrong with creating a thread asking a simple question so long as a mirrored thread does not already exist, no discussion searchable exists for what was asked so the thread is fine, has been addressed in a positive manner by two forumers, and the matter is over, leave it be you ass.

Originally Posted by vphamv

should i have answered this question too?

http://www.stoptazmo.com/showpost.ph...3&postcount=12

That kid is dumb...
He didn't read the rules...

And well about this thread...
Its not hard to answer it...
Just tell him in what chapter and it is done...

^exactly my point
and i would have answered it if said he/she never read it before but from what he/she wrote it seems he/she has the volumes to read, that person could have easily just looked through it again. which is exactly what i told the person to do. I still dont think it was necessary to make a thread about it.

Originally Posted by event

Firstly

You're joining the bandwagon because you said "this thread fails", something I know for a FACT you learned while viewing some other jackasses post, that statement was not original to you in any way, so yes, you are in fact doing something that has been deemed trendy on forums by asses.

how do you know this is fact? do i know you? o_O

now on the other hand, the person who said "You are so true, mayb that's because you are a dumbass" seems like the rude one to me. i simply told him to read it again and nothing else.

if you dont even want to look at what i say, then why should i want to read what you have to say? what you're saying sound a lot rude compared what you said i was being rude for, and the thing is he/she is just being really lazy to flip through some pages, and last i remembered this forum doesnt like lazy people. heck ive posted stupid things before, had someone tell me that and i just learned from it. so why are you getting so angry? its... the internet...