Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Jyuu's Avatar
    Jyuu is offline Super Moderator Community Builder
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    6,689

    Default Undecided on what upgrade path to take.

    I currently have two 7900GTX in SLI.
    However, since the 8800GTX will be supposedly oh-so-awesome, I am considering not to SLI two of them and just get a PhysX card instead in the FINALLY free PCI slot that's next to my 2nd PCI-E x16 slot that is currently being blocked by my second video card.

    Here are the options:
    SLI two 8800GTX
    Get ONE 8800GTX and ONE PhysX card


    No other option will be considered.

    I've been an SLI user since the 7800GTX came out last year and I'm really loving it and that's why I am a bit undecided.

    The games that I am wanting to play are Crysis and Alan Wake and they would probably take advantage of the graphics horsepower at 1920x1200, so that's why I am wanting to get SLI again. But will a single 8800GTX suffice at that resolution?
    I know that it is almost impossible to predict, but what are YOUR opinions?

    What would YOU rather get?
    SLI 8800GTX?
    8800GTX + PhysX?

    I still have about 2-3 weeks to decide, but I just want to make a decision quickly.

  2. #2
    Volvogga's Avatar
    Volvogga is offline Senior Member Always Around
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    MI, USA
    Posts
    2,076

    Default

    SLI. nVidia isn't really that on board with PhysX. The 8*** series is supposed to contain new instuction set or some shit that will compete with PhysX. So, SLI will probably be better.

    Then again, games are only as good as what their written for. If you get a PhysX game, then your not going to gain anything with SLI. If you get a game that uses... umm... Havar/Hectic/Havic (something like that) or the new nVidia stuff, then the SLI will be amazing.

    So, from the info I got last time I looked, you basicly got this choice.

    SLI: HOLYSACREDMOTHEROFGOD!!! O_o (some of the time)
    PhysX: Wooooooooooow... that's niiiiiiiice. (all of the time)

    My opinion, SLI.
    PhysX is PCI... I'd wait till they made the card able to go into PCI-E, or put it directly on the video card. Then again... Soundblasters keep up. Meh, I still say SLI.
    Vol~

    thanks to Silverwmoon!

  3. #3
    Heiji1412 is offline Senior Member Frequent Poster
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    136

    Default

    The engine is called Havok.

    I never though Jyuu would need advice from someone else, as from what I've read, he knows his stuff, but I agree with Vol, Havok physics are fine, and I don't know if Crysis and Alan Wake (Max Payne devs, right?) are going to take advantage of Havok FX or not, but if they do, that's even better, no need for PhysX. IMO, half the reason to play PC games is the graphics ^_~ so get the second graphics card.

    On another note, are the leaked specs of the 8800 real?

  4. #4
    Jyuu's Avatar
    Jyuu is offline Super Moderator Community Builder
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    6,689

    Default

    Hmm, I will see if there are any new motherboards coming out with less PCI-E x1 slots and more PCI slots so that I can have two 8800GTX in SLI AND a PhysX card.

    + My X-Fi Fatal1ty of course.

  5. #5
    Panda Sama is offline Member Frequent Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    65

    Default

    actualy, you would want to not buy the current physx card. its PCI and still very first gen and BAD!!! it actualy lowers your FPS significantly (look at GRAW benchmarks). so, 300 for low FPS and a lil more boom facter...well, thats your decision. physx will be soon released in its true glory as a PCI-1x card. its rumered to be able to calculate exponentialy more due to the added bandwidth. jumping the gun on a 8800GTX SLI rig is surprisingly hasty. i would first test with 1x8800 then get the second one since this DX10 revolution, 8800 will be first gen test bed card (much like physx so you dont know what to expect). thats my 2 cents as an older SLI user (2x6800GT...thats right...GT...try to find one of those =D).

  6. #6
    Jyuu's Avatar
    Jyuu is offline Super Moderator Community Builder
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    6,689

    Default

    Haha, they fixed that issue in GRAW a long time ago and I don't think I'd be affected by any drop in fps in that game. My two 7900GTX deliver way more than 60fps and even if it drops by 15 fps, I wouldn't see it since I vsync all my games at 60Hz/60fps to avoid tearing.

    Even if the 8800GTX sucks, I'd just get two R600 and Crossfire them to see if they are any better.

    Consider my wallet to be unlimited when it comes to buying computer stuff.

  7. #7
    xxsaznpride is offline Senior Member Always Around
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Cali
    Posts
    1,480

    Default

    From what I've heard from my friends, the double graphics capabilities of SLI (... that's what it is, how redundant) are a bit better than PhysX. I don't know what these things are outside of that they're super expensive graphics processing systems (I have a gist... I guess).

    I say stick with the SLI. It's tried and tested... and it works. Why bother getting something new to use something that you can run without error using something old??
    Quote Originally Posted by AvatarST
    And your name's annoying to type; from now on you're sazny.
    Farleen // Number 42

  8. #8
    Panda Sama is offline Member Frequent Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    65

    Default

    well, ATI is coming out with Triple CrossFire type thing soon. 2 cards in SLI and 1 more calculating physx. they claim that they can outdo agea with only the X1800 (which right now is cheaper than the physx card). now think of next gen...*drools slightly*

  9. #9
    Jyuu's Avatar
    Jyuu is offline Super Moderator Community Builder
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    6,689

    Default

    ATI makes great products, but I wouldn't touch one unless it's more than great.
    Why? Their drivers SUCK and Crossfire is buggy as hell. I've worked on about a dozen Crossfire setups so far and only two of them worked normally and it was on a P5W DH, which uses an INTEL chipset (the 975x) and the others were either on the ATI Crossfire Xpress 1600 or 3200.
    Their triple video card solution involves the use of the RD600 chipset and I don't want to use that.

  10. #10
    Volvogga's Avatar
    Volvogga is offline Senior Member Always Around
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    MI, USA
    Posts
    2,076

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xxsaznpride View Post
    Why bother getting something new to use something that you can run without error using something old??
    Because we can...

    I wish there was more, but that's really about it.
    Bleeding edge ftw!
    Vol~

    thanks to Silverwmoon!

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
vBulletin Skin by: ForumThemes.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2014 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162