Sukebe, I can't help but feel that your comment was directed at me. If it wasn't then forgive me for directly addressing your comment.
10x better? Hardly. I measured art quality in many different aspects. It's a fact that the character drawings of Suzuka are head and shoulders above Ichigo 100%, but the drawings of Ichigo 100% contain much more detail than Suzuka in terms of objects and other background paraphernalia, as well being more interesting to look at with the variations of angels and views that were used. Too many of Suzuka's panels were in views that were just too linear and straight-on. Most of the panels could be much better if Kouji Seo incorporated more obtuse angles. It's a quirk that hindered the high grade character drawings and the art quality as a whole. I'm probably one of the few that actually notice stuff like that, but grading artwork is mostly a matter of opinion anyway.Originally Posted by sukebe
As for the character development, yes you can compare the two. Suzuka's potential development vs. Ichigo 100%'s proven development. Sure Suzuka is still in the process. Sure Suzuka has more potential than Ichigo 100% ever had. But that doesn't mean anything if Suzuka doesn't pan out. I'll take the proven commodity at this date and time.Originally Posted by sukebe
...Although I'm seriously predicting that chapter 119 or chapter 120 will greatly show the effects of the character development within Suzuka...
Both Ichigo 100% and Suzuka started out as a Shounen comedy. Both then started to focus on the drama aspect. Unless Yuka, Megumi, and a certain girl bumping into a pole while talking are not considered comedy anymore, I can't agree with you that they are that far apart genre-wise as you imply.Originally Posted by sukebe