Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    whatsntomake is offline Member Frequent Poster
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    49

    Default Singles 1 position is overated.

    One of the twists they added to the nationals it that all positions have to be played - makes the loss/win thing less predicatable - otherwise it was like zomg! they will always lose 1 doubles position.

    The problem with singles 1 is that you if you lose both doubles then you should have a strong singles 3 player who can easily carry the win or if both doubles win then your singles 3 player can decisively end the match.

  2. #2
    magictos is offline Senior Member Long Time Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    sumwhere
    Posts
    735

    Default

    not all positions have to be played, it's just the first match i think.. then as long as u can have 3 players win, then it's over.. (fudomine's match against shitenhouji)

    are u talking about the orders in nationals or before nationals..

    cus if you're talking bout nationals.. which

    s3,d2,s2,d1,s1

    then it means if u predict u're gonna lose first 2 matches, then u must have a strong singles 2 player

  3. #3
    nani is offline Member Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    34

    Default

    it rllly doesnt matter
    u just gotta have atleast 3 good spots
    Whether its all 3 single matches or 2 singles aned a double or wuteva
    as longas u win with those 3 teams ull win

  4. #4
    d.A. is offline Senior Member Well Known
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Socal.
    Posts
    304

    Default

    Assuming your using the Davis Cup match rules which was depicted during the PoT nationals...

    Singles 1 is overrated? Yes.

    From a coaching perspective you can mix the order up to your advantage.

    Say a match against two teams is rather even in all levels of play. As in team A Singles 1 is evenly matched with team B Singles 1, and so on. Also assume that singles 2 is significantly weaker than singles 1, and singles 3 weaker than singles 2. Then you can throw away both #1 singles and create a match advantage by doing the following:

    Opponent S1 Vs Your S3 = Loss

    Opponent S2 Vs Your S1 = Win

    Opponent S3 Vs Your S2 = Win

    Assuming doubles is also a stalemate by forfeiting doubles 1 you can secure the match outcome.

    Opponent D1 Vs Your D2 = Loss

    Opponent D2 Vs Your D1 = Win

    You win 3 to 2.

    Of course if singles 3 and singles 1 are have equal amount of talent and skill then this doesn't work, but it's a situation that shows how the singles 1 position can be useless. No matter how storng singles 1 is.

    Total team depth is far more important than the strength of the singles 1 player in team matches.

    Join the movement today.

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
vBulletin Skin by: ForumThemes.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2014 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79