Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    whatsntomake is offline Member Frequent Poster
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    49

    Default Singles 1 position is overated.

    One of the twists they added to the nationals it that all positions have to be played - makes the loss/win thing less predicatable - otherwise it was like zomg! they will always lose 1 doubles position.

    The problem with singles 1 is that you if you lose both doubles then you should have a strong singles 3 player who can easily carry the win or if both doubles win then your singles 3 player can decisively end the match.

  2. #2
    magictos is offline Senior Member Long Time Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    sumwhere
    Posts
    735

    Default

    not all positions have to be played, it's just the first match i think.. then as long as u can have 3 players win, then it's over.. (fudomine's match against shitenhouji)

    are u talking about the orders in nationals or before nationals..

    cus if you're talking bout nationals.. which

    s3,d2,s2,d1,s1

    then it means if u predict u're gonna lose first 2 matches, then u must have a strong singles 2 player

  3. #3
    nani is offline Member Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    34

    Default

    it rllly doesnt matter
    u just gotta have atleast 3 good spots
    Whether its all 3 single matches or 2 singles aned a double or wuteva
    as longas u win with those 3 teams ull win

  4. #4
    d.A. is offline Senior Member Well Known
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Socal.
    Posts
    304

    Default

    Assuming your using the Davis Cup match rules which was depicted during the PoT nationals...

    Singles 1 is overrated? Yes.

    From a coaching perspective you can mix the order up to your advantage.

    Say a match against two teams is rather even in all levels of play. As in team A Singles 1 is evenly matched with team B Singles 1, and so on. Also assume that singles 2 is significantly weaker than singles 1, and singles 3 weaker than singles 2. Then you can throw away both #1 singles and create a match advantage by doing the following:

    Opponent S1 Vs Your S3 = Loss

    Opponent S2 Vs Your S1 = Win

    Opponent S3 Vs Your S2 = Win

    Assuming doubles is also a stalemate by forfeiting doubles 1 you can secure the match outcome.

    Opponent D1 Vs Your D2 = Loss

    Opponent D2 Vs Your D1 = Win

    You win 3 to 2.

    Of course if singles 3 and singles 1 are have equal amount of talent and skill then this doesn't work, but it's a situation that shows how the singles 1 position can be useless. No matter how storng singles 1 is.

    Total team depth is far more important than the strength of the singles 1 player in team matches.

    Join the movement today.

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
vBulletin Skin by: ForumThemes.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2014 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162