I really don't agree with this. That basically means that threads don't have a chance to become long and full of discussion, since they'll be bumped back a few days after their creation. Many good threads are not recent creations, and I doubt people would go back so many pages to find a really good discussion (unless they had a lot of free time they wanted to use up...). We'll constantly be seeing repeat threads, which are especially bad when a topic is actively being discussed, and the offenders would have the excellent excuse of "well, I didn't see the thread" (and can they be blamed if the thread is on page 5?).
I wouldn't say it solves necroing, either; morons will still post in old threads. Additionally, I believe that means spam threads will stay up there longer - if they're locked or no one posts in them, then they can easily be knocked down by posts in older threads. With this system, that will not occur. Besides, locking a thread takes much less time/effort than deleting it (really).
So basically, I think this is a bad idea.
~Digital_Eon~
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Bookmarks