Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    JY is offline Junior Member Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2005

    Default Good in Everyone

    They say that there is good in everyone no matter how evil they appear to be. Do you think this is the case for Raito? At first, he had good intentions and wanted to cleanse the world of evil, but then he became corrupted. At that point, it was obvious that he only wanted to take over the world. Still, do you agree with the saying that there is good in everyone, including Raito, no matter what? It seems pretty hard to follow that belief after seeing Raito in action.
    Last edited by JY; 03-18-2008 at 01:05 PM.

  2. #2
    timmy54416 is offline Member Frequent Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    The seventh ring of heaven


    I do think there is good in everyone, because his ideals and goals never really faltered. They just changed.

  3. #3
    russ869 is offline Member Frequent Poster
    Join Date
    Feb 2006


    But just as important is the fact that there is evil in everyone. That's how one person (in this case Light) can have the potential to be a kind normal person and an insane evil monster. That is the complexity of the human phsyche.

  4. #4
    tvking is offline Junior Member Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2008


    Yeah, that is true that there is good in everyone, but don't forget that which person have good quality , he have also evil habits. i don't know much but i think it is true and everyone know it..and what you think guys?

  5. #5
    Saizou is offline Senior Member Always Around
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Helsinki, Finland


    "Good" and "Evil" are attributes of actions, not people. To specify further, an action is "good" if it causes a net increase of utility, and "evil" if it causes a net decrease. Also note that the concepts of "good" and "evil" are not equivalent to the terms "moral" and "immoral" in this case.

    "Moral" and "immoral" on the other hand, are attributes of people. We can say that a person is "moral" or "immoral", but the qualifications are a bit different. To simplify a bit, a person is "moral" if he acts in such a way that he can reasonably expect that his actions will cause a net increase in utility. In other words, you're moral if you can objectively conclude that your actions are "good".

    Now, as we've gotten the definitions in place, we can apply this to Death Note, and Raito in particular. First we must determine whether his actions were "good". First the positive. He obviously did reduce crime, which is undoubtedly a good thing. He also had the stated intent to do good, i.e. eliminate crime from the world.

    However, what he didn't do was to think of the long-term consequences of his plan. It is obvious that he could only achieve his goal by instituting an atmosphere of terror in the general populace. He obviously thought that this was an acceptable exchange for a crime-free world, however, this is where he was wrong.

    In a society ruled by fear and unseen, arbitrary justice it is obvious that people would be gripped by a feeling that is best described as a religious terror. Everyone, everywhere would constantly be on the edge, knowing that the executioner's blade is constantly hovering above their necks if they step out of line. As we can see, this is exacty what happened, complete with cults and all dedicated to Kira. Now, crime may be a terrible social problem, but it should be obvious that the existance of crime still is better than an unknown entity that is judge, jury and executioner in one, dispensing arbitrary justice.

    Therefore, even discounting Raito's god complex (because that abviously makes him immoral anyway), we still can't conclude that he was anything else than immoral from the get-go.

  6. #6
    Duststorm is offline Senior Member Respected Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007


    Light's plan to rid the world of criminals was good but the main flaw was what will happen after he dies of old age? Does he think that none of is successors will become corrupt and use the death note for their own selfish reasons.

    If Light was evil or not is debatable. He had a good goal but he was too obsessed trying to be God that he became evil. In the end he only cared about himself, he did not care about his family anymore.

    So yes Light was mostly evil in the end.

  7. #7
    lyjg1203 is offline Banned Newbie
    Join Date
    Dec 2008

    Default Rock around the clock

    Shamans grounding a lot of damage on Brutallus was only on the PTR; wow goldunfortunately it didn't go live. But overall Shamans excel in Sunwell because of the amount of raid damage that Blizzard is programming into the fights. world of warcraft goldIt's really power levelingIn some fights you have 2 tank healers and every other healer will be healing the raid. wow goldThat's just so different from how it was back in the days where you had 14-15 healers on a single tank with the raid taking almost no damage.As a WoW player, I'm honestly not sure what she means by the "challenging form," wow goldthough she could be comparing PvP to PvE servers. Nardi goes on to point out more differences between Chinese and American WoW gamers

  8. #8
    Karapoc is offline Junior Member Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2008


    I think that there is good in Light, but his ego got the better of him, and started thinking he could be the one who decided what was good and evil.




Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
vBulletin Skin by:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2015 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79