Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    98abaile's Avatar
    98abaile is offline Senior Member Community Builder
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    An Englishman in a shithole somewhere in Wales.
    Posts
    7,892

    Default Fukushima upgraded to Level 7 accident.


  2. #2
    Saizou is offline Senior Member Always Around
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    1,279

    Default

    It isn't Chernobyl-level yet, it's only released about a tenth of the amount of radioactive material that was released at Chernobyl.

    Still serious, but it's not remotely as serious because the spread of the material isn't as widespread. The most of the material is probably I-131, which has a halflife of about 8 days, and thus will decay away to irrelevant levels pretty soon.

  3. #3
    StealDragon's Avatar
    StealDragon is offline Super Moderator Community Builder
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    NCC-1701
    Posts
    13,423

    Default

    Count on stupid people to wreck the possibilities of nuclear energy in America for the next forty years AGAIN. There goes the most reasonable way to power America...down the drain... look its swiiiiiiiiirrrrrrling. >


    I'd like to die with the songs I love stuck in my head. I hope to make the most of these hollow bones we become.
    I raise a toast to the the souls that sang all along. I've been gathering friends to just to make some sounds,
    before the ship goes down, I've been making amends by making the rounds before the whole world ends


    [Chit Chat Specific Forum Rules] // Last Update - Friday March 13, 2009

  4. #4
    BlueDemon is offline Senior Member Community Builder
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,286

    Default

    Wouldnīt call it reasonable...but better than having coal fueled power stations!
    Iīm all for renewable energy, if itīs properly done (that means weīll have to wait some more years for it )

    But I donīt think the USA will give nuclear energy up that easily.

  5. #5
    98abaile's Avatar
    98abaile is offline Senior Member Community Builder
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    An Englishman in a shithole somewhere in Wales.
    Posts
    7,892

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlueDemon View Post
    Wouldnīt call it reasonable...but better than having coal fueled power stations!
    Iīm all for renewable energy, if itīs properly done (that means weīll have to wait some more years for it )

    But I donīt think the USA will give nuclear energy up that easily.
    The problem with renewables is that they are just not efficient enough. IIRC of all the wind farms (283 with 3153 turbines between them) in the UK they only ever work at 29% capacity and only provide 2% of our energy needs, compared to nuclear power which provides roughly 1/6 of our energy needs(with 9 stations sharing 19 reactors)). Wind energy is also roughly 3 times the price of nuclear energy.

  6. #6
    Henchy432 is offline Senior Member Community Builder
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Harlem
    Posts
    3,818

    Default

    Hydro electric is the way to go or maybe Superman farts.

  7. #7
    kazenohirameki is offline Senior Member Respected Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    On an island
    Posts
    428

    Default

    Go into solar energy...

    And you'll find yourself in the crisis portray in MS Gundam 00.

    What other alternative energy exist?

  8. #8
    Stuyvesant is offline Senior Member Always Around
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SA
    Posts
    1,680

    Default

    Well there is always geothermal.

    Nuclear energy is pretty much the way to go now days. Well, assuming you live in a relatively geologically stable area, I guess.

  9. #9
    R3dKnight is offline Senior Member Community Builder
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    third world country
    Posts
    4,641

    Default

    Geothermal?
    Clean?

    Is just that we didn't have any geothermal relate accident yet.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidoarjo_mud_flow

  10. #10
    Stuyvesant is offline Senior Member Always Around
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SA
    Posts
    1,680

    Default

    WTH? That's damned cool. I didn't know about the existence of mud volcanoes.

    Yeah, it is possible that we'll have major geothermal incidents. They're not going to be leaving much in the way of toxic waste though. Flip side is, I reckon putting stop-gaps on may not be quite so easy...

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
vBulletin Skin by: ForumThemes.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2014 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162