Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    morten is offline Senior Member Community Builder
    Join Date
    Nov 2006

    Default Google vs. Scanlators

    Google Search has banned the scanlator group "Little White Butterflies" from their search index. As in action, other sites as MangaFox and MangaUpdates (baka) were forced to either remove scanlations or get their google adds ripped off.
    Series like Dance in a vampires bund, Omamori Himari and even Kaichou wa maid-sama have been removed because they were too "mature" and contained minors.
    MangaFox did so, MangaUpdates refused to subordinate to this request...

    Google Delists Lolicon Scanlation Site, Manga Aggregator Removes Titles

    Google has delisted the Little White Butterflies lolicon manga scanlation site from its index based on a complaint that the site hosted child pornography, despite the complaint having little actual merit based on independent research. This also follows another similar complaint received by aggregator MangaFox this past weekend, which promptly removed a number of titles afterwards that were clearly listed as lolicon manga despite having no pornographic content.

    As the United States Code exempts fictional sexual depictions of children under 18 U.S.C. 2256(11), the delisting clearly violates Google’s “do no evil” ethical policy in light of its failed anti-censorship crusade in China, but furthering the issue as a legal matter will be difficult as suggested by others in the community since the site hosts copyright infringing derivative works without proper licensing to distribute the material.

    The above situation creates a dilemma as publishers and authors are averse to defend a site which conflicts with their commercial interests while expressing support on ethical and free speech grounds in any other case.

    The webmaster for the site has contacted Google to work with the search provider in order to resolve the issue, though it remains to be seen what the end result will be. The Handley case continues to have its shockwaves felt, with these latest issues at the forefront.
    This is one of the few conflicts in line about the issue of "Loli manga" as considered as child pornography or not...

    However, at least one current US definition of child pornography explicitly excludes artistic depictions:

    This definition does not apply to depictions that are drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or paintings depicting minors or adults.

    Other definitions (there are a wide variety of conflicting statutes) which do not exclude 2D material are usually said to be unconstitutional but have generally gone unenforced and unchallenged, giving lolicon material a murky legal status.

    Google apparently did not concern itself with such subtleties and simply removed the site, leaving a standard “deleted results” disclaimer in its place.

    The site itself has now been removed from the indexes of all Google servers, raising additional concerns over the global censorship of results based on US law alone.

    With Google seemingly acknowledging it has a duty to delete millions of sites with “loli” material, irrespective of their legality wherever they might be published, it would appear it will either have to back down or begin systemically delisting huge swathes of the Japanese Internet (recall that even mainstream publications like Shonen Jump freely publish lewd depictions of underage characters), to say nothing of the wider Internet.

    In fact, practically any illustrated depiction of sexual activity could be branded child pornography if this approach were taken to extremes – few could reasonably claim to be able to tell the difference between a 17-year-old cartoon and an 18-year-old one. Abusive and excessive use seems all but inevitable.

    Others have pointed out that with the site in question already hosting material in violation of publisher copyright, artists and publishers are likely to be especially ambivalent about pressing the matter with Google lest they end up supporting piracy of their own works – clearly it would have been more desirable for such a test case to be unencumbered by copyright violation as well.

    Google’s “do no evil” policy has largely been left in tatters since its abortive dalliance with the Chinese government, but with the introduction of an apparent system of anonymous child pornography denunciations with no legal basis it appears set to become even less credible.
    Regarding this issue, Google seems to go through with their plan to clear out it's record on everything related to this aspect. Such as, banning important manga sites from their main funding google adds, as has happened with baka...

    Quote Originally Posted by Banned from Adsense, Future funding plans
    Hello all,

    In case you haven't noticed recently, we've removed all of the ads supporting this site. We recently received an email from Google stating our account was disabled. Upon appeal, we were rejected. No particular reason was provided, so we are quite surprised as we have funded the site using Adsense for the past 5 years with no issues. If anything, I suppose I feel quite liberated. It was quite daunting living in the environment of fear Google has created with their Publisher system.

    As far as funding issues go, we're not sure where we stand at the moment. Over the next few weeks, I will be experimenting with different ad networks. We're not in the red yet, but this is something we will try to work out over the next few months. If we cannot find a suitable replacement, we will be forced to ask for donations as it comes time to pay our server bills. I had hoped it would never come to this, but we cannot control everything. I have enjoyed the free ride that Adsense has given us over the years, and only hope that any new network we join is not more intrusive to your experience than Adsense was.

    For the moment, everyone sit tight. We're going to try some alternative funding routes.

    Thank you all for your understanding,

    Yet, it's not verified that the "Little White Butterflies" incident is related with Googles move to reject baka from their funding.
    But if baka won't have the money needed to host it's server, the most important manga library and information page of the internet will vanish underlying Googles decision.

    It might be that more manga scanlation groups, manga online viewer sites and information pages might be affected of Googles decision to ban anything related to this incident...

    I will keep monitoring this new situation and will post uptodates if anything new happens...

    Edit: Originally it was this article that started everything: Google Sponsors Child Pornography

    The author indicates that loli related manga and anime is child pornography and contacted himslef several companies advertising with the help of Google to point their attention to his own idiocy...

    One of the comments following the authors article:

    Christ man, do you realize how much damage you’ve done just to prove a stupid point?

    Everyone already knows Google is evil, if you’ve got a grudge with them leave the rest of the internet out of it.
    Last edited by morten; 04-20-2010 at 07:24 PM.

  2. #2
    mystic_guard_sinoel is offline Senior Member Community Builder
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    The 14th Moon


    it's dumb but it makes sense why they're doing it.

    child porn is illegal and sponsoring a site that is releasing it doesn't look good.

  3. #3
    be0wulf is offline Senior Member Community Builder
    Join Date
    Jun 2006


    Pretty much what SNS said. Don't hate the player, hate the game.

    Until the US decides to change its child porn laws, I can hardly fault Google for complying.

  4. #4
    98abaile's Avatar
    98abaile is offline Senior Member Community Builder
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    An Englishman in a shithole somewhere in Wales.


    I'm not generally a fan of lolicon, and I hate lolicon hentai, but this just seems like some do gooder on an ego trip, railing against something that, while morally ambiguous, has nothing really wrong with it.

    Ichigo Mashimaro is a great series and the injoke is that one of the characters is a lolicon, but as the mantra goes, it's cute not paedo.

    I also just finished strike witches and despite being overtly sexualised and containing nudity (apparently underage nipple is fine in Japan - maybe because its animated, but thats a different issue), it's not padophilia (no sex acts are performed). Actually it was quite good in spite of it being a lolicon show.

  5. #5
    Stuyvesant is offline Senior Member Always Around
    Join Date
    Feb 2008


    I don't really go for the whole lolicon thing either, but I think this is a bit of a crock. One of the great things about the net is that it is free and uncensored. I have no problem with that as long as no one gets hurt. People hosting real life paedo stuff should be hunted down and shot, but manga? That's pushing it.

  6. #6
    vphamv is offline Senior Member Community Builder
    Join Date
    Oct 2006


    How does this affect you Dante?

    Sorta weird that only they are targeted.
    Street Fighter > All

  7. #7
    Kiryuu is offline Junior Member Newbie
    Join Date
    Feb 2008


    It's japans fault for making loli hentai

  8. #8
    Alex1411 is offline Junior Member Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2010


    I hate lolicon hentai,
    Learn more about our Fashion Games website.Fashion Games




Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
vBulletin Skin by:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2015 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79