which of these 2 mp3 players is better to have? well, i think sansa is more user friendly and has more functionalities than Ipod...how bout u?
Printable View
which of these 2 mp3 players is better to have? well, i think sansa is more user friendly and has more functionalities than Ipod...how bout u?
I never heard of a sansa...
I have an ipod.
Dunno, Like CPR, never heard of a Sansa. Own a Ipod too. But my experience with them is that they freeze alot more then other mp3's.
iPods have been very good to me, so I choose iPod. Never heard of Sansa.
I've never owned an Ipod, so... neither?
Sansa probably has a longer battery life than the ipod. My ipod video lasts about 4 hours on one charge.
It also depends on which sansa mp3 player you're talking about.
Fuck em both. Get a Zen
http://d4rkn3ss.files.wordpress.com/...32gb-crave.jpg
<3
Is this like the Zune? Because, that was full of fail. I have a ipod, I just don't use it.
Anything but an ipod. You ipod owners can correct me if I'm wrong, but I understand that you _have_ to use itunes to put music on your ipod (well, I'm sure there's a hack around that somewhere though). If you actually want to use itunes then go right ahead, but I choose not to be limited to it.
Any other mp3 player you just copy the files on, exactly like copying files on a disk. No funny software required. And it's easy to access all the music files on any other computer without installing anything. Plus there are loads of other mp3 players that are cheaper _and_ have all the same features, sometimes more. Does the ipod shuffle have a radio tuner? My no-name $40 thumb drive lookalike does, plus a display and built-in USB plug.
I have to admit the ipod Touch looks pretty good. I would want it just for the wifi.
By the way, Sansa is the name of Sandisk's line of mp3 players. If I remember correctly they're the #2 maker of mp3 players, although far behind Apple in sales. I prefer the mp3 players by Creative.