Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19
  1. #11
    deuce22 is offline Senior Member Community Builder
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    4,146

    Default

    No~

    women will now start taking over the world. =(

    they dont even need us to make babies anymore....boo~~~~~~~~


  2. #12
    echoblaze is offline Senior Member Community Builder
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,601

    Default

    ^
    imagine if extreme feminists decide to concoct and spread a Y-linked infectious disease, they'd still be able to preserve the human race ! o no

  3. #13
    mystic_guard_sinoel is offline Senior Member Community Builder
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The 14th Moon
    Posts
    5,234

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Terasiel View Post
    Even if they did make "synthetic" ova, Digi's scenario would be even better. Someone has to carry the embryo.
    2guys1baby?

  4. #14
    Schiljo is offline Senior Member Long Time Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Heaven or hell
    Posts
    830

    Default

    I wonder... if they take a bone sample from a woman and turn it into sperm and impregnate her with it. Would it technically be cloning?

  5. #15
    Sherman is offline Senior Member Always Around
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Tokyo
    Posts
    2,227

    Default

    This is a pretty good idea I guess - it must be annoying for gay couples to never be able to have a baby that's just theirs. Now they can. But yeah, I can definitely see that there could be some unforeseen deformities and other shenanigans coming out of this.

  6. #16
    dna2playboy is offline Senior Member Community Builder
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    waboomafoof
    Posts
    2,619

    Default

    according to the article they are at least a decade away from successfully turning a woman's bone marrow into sperm. Also their mice test subjects had health problems. I doubt this will ever work as a proper means of reproducing.

  7. #17
    Terasiel is offline Senior Member Community Builder
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    South Carolina, US
    Posts
    3,310

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Schiljo View Post
    I wonder... if they take a bone sample from a woman and turn it into sperm and impregnate her with it. Would it technically be cloning?
    I can't imagine why not. It's her DNA into herself. Imagine the horror if that baby were to turn out to be a tempermental estro-beast. Take that, self-esteem!

  8. #18
    cpr's Avatar
    cpr
    cpr is offline Super Moderator Community Builder
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    4,952

    Default

    three words: waste of money.

    I'm with whoever said "adoption." Theres thousands... maybe millions of children without parents who'd love to have parents. Why not start there? =/

  9. #19
    bipolargraph is offline Senior Member Always Around
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Location
    Posts
    2,177

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by coolpuprocks View Post
    three words: waste of money.

    I'm with whoever said "adoption." Theres thousands... maybe millions of children without parents who'd love to have parents. Why not start there? =/
    Agreed.
    They're gonna spend a lot of money, and they won't be able to perfect it. The money would be much better spent at cancer research or something.

 

 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
vBulletin Skin by: ForumThemes.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2014 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79