![]() |
Social Groups
|
|
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | |
| View Complete Manga Series: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
Einstein, proven wrong?
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/mai...cispeed116.xml
Would be pretty interesting if this was true...
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|||
|
Agree SD, something like this always makes my stomach go wild:
Quote:
Its the same idea as, "when you move against the spin of the earth you travel back in time". Just wrong, so wrong... |
|
|||
|
Not really. You would see yourself still standing in the original spot when you look back over your shoulder.
We can also take up one other thing this would imply. The faster an object moves, the slower time passes for that object. This would mean traveling into the future (and no, that's not a joke) |
|
|||
|
Hey, you leave "Comic book science" out of this. If Superman wants to turn back time he can. His mother said he could.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
||||
|
lol, Don't think those germans have solved anything..how can they find something traveling faster then the speed of light when it does not exist..
But the things they talk about..aint that still just a theory..?
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|||
|
Einstein never said that c cannot be exceeded, that was just one of the principles that must be assumed to be true for general and special relativity to be true. And this definitely is the case almost all the time. Just like Newtonian mechanics is adequate most of the time on Earth.
I would wait to see whether this is true and how it can be implemented though, apparently these guys have also made similar claims in the past. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|