Thread: ESRB reing of Tyranny

Originally Posted by irecinius

My problem.. is that the AO rating is the ESRB's way of being able to ban games they find offensive. You don't get a chance for YOU to decide the game is offensive.

You're basically questioning part of society itself.

ESRB is a tyrant just like the FCC. The people i blame most are those MOthers who sit at home with no time on their hands and their lack of good sex.

Well the ESRB is supposed to be a reflection OF society making decisions and rating games on what they think is best for society... Bah rating = fascism.

Look those organizations are looking out for the game industry. I did not want some dumbass sentor telling me what games to play, more on this later.

Instead of one dumbass senator we have a dumbass organization? I don't really see the difference. Someone who is not me is deciding what I should and should not see. To hell with that.

but arent those laws introduced by senators?? OUr country is being ran by a bunch of Old men and women(though scarce). We need some new young Bloods in there.

... Shut up.

Originally Posted by ghost305

but arent those laws introduced by senators?? OUr country is being ran by a bunch of Old men and women(though scarce). We need some new young Bloods in there.

Yeah.

We need young "Bloods."


I can't wait to see these young, upstanding dudes in Capitol Hill, making laws, deciding on ESRB ratings, though I personally think Crips would be better.

@Jakko, and Stealdragon
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that I didn't mean young bloods as in "Gang Members". I meant YOung blood as in young man or fresh face. Originally that's what YOung blood meant.

Originally Posted by Jakko

Yeah.

We need young "Bloods."


I can't wait to see these young, upstanding dudes in Capitol Hill, making laws, deciding on ESRB ratings, though I personally think Crips would be better.

Damn, you got here before me =(