I would take it all and leave her with like 1 room.
I'd take my half of the house and give the bitch what for – A small fuel air ignitor in her closet, with some accelerants mixed from house hold materials.
Yeah, you got me.
Originally Posted by Chizabubble
All I can think of is the Bible story where one woman was sleeping and rolled over top of her baby, suffocating him. She then stole another woman's baby, and Solomon had to figure out who was the real mother, as both made the claim. So, Solomon said he was going to cut the baby in half, and the women could share it, and pretended to start this. The real mother pleaded for the babies' life(even at the expense of her claim), while the fake mother thought this was a fine idea. And that was how Solomon figured out who was the real mother.
/end Bible lesson, kiddies. And here is the moral of the story: Even the wisest man ever(Solomon), could be made to do stupid things when he has over three hundred wives; in contrast to Love Hina, it shows that harems are bad(though this has nothing to do with the story I just said...).
Is that it, Chiza?
I thought the baby was supposedly born stillborn, not that she suffocated it by accident?
Originally Posted by Jakko
I support the call that she accidentally suffocated her baby. (I tried to find a reference but I'm too tired to find it tonight) - this is the only reference I have right now, it claims it was smothering too though:
@Jakko: I love the moral, I'll keep that in mind next time I find myself the subject of the attentions of a harem ^_^
1 Kings 3:16-28
16 Now two prostitutes came to the king and stood before him. 17 One of them said, "My lord, this woman and I live in the same house. I had a baby while she was there with me. 18 The third day after my child was born, this woman also had a baby. We were alone; there was no one in the house but the two of us.
19 "During the night this woman's son died because she lay on him. 20 So she got up in the middle of the night and took my son from my side while I your servant was asleep. She put him by her breast and put her dead son by my breast. 21 The next morning, I got up to nurse my son—and he was dead! But when I looked at him closely in the morning light, I saw that it wasn't the son I had borne."
22 The other woman said, "No! The living one is my son; the dead one is yours."
But the first one insisted, "No! The dead one is yours; the living one is mine." And so they argued before the king.
23 The king said, "This one says, 'My son is alive and your son is dead,' while that one says, 'No! Your son is dead and mine is alive.' "
24 Then the king said, "Bring me a sword." So they brought a sword for the king. 25 He then gave an order: "Cut the living child in two and give half to one and half to the other."
26 The woman whose son was alive was filled with compassion for her son and said to the king, "Please, my lord, give her the living baby! Don't kill him!"
But the other said, "Neither I nor you shall have him. Cut him in two!"
27 Then the king gave his ruling: "Give the living baby to the first woman. Do not kill him; she is his mother." 28 When all Israel heard the verdict the king had given, they held the king in awe, because they saw that he had wisdom from God to administer justice.
P.S. - It is actually possible that what you read was from an edited version of the Bible, used by some liberal churches(certain Episcopalian groups for instance) who actually edit the Bible to suit their purposes. I don't consider those people to be Christians, though.
all versions of the bible are edited
I think you will agree there is a huge difference between changing "thee" and "thy" to "me" and "my," adding a preface to the story of Jonah stating "this is a work of fiction that is not true."
Originally Posted by dna2playboy
P.S. - There is a difference between being "cheeky" and "smart assed," DNA.
It doesn't matter which one you are being Jakko, no one likes either of them.
Originally Posted by Jakko