*moves to Italy*
*moves to Italy*
that's good to know !Originally Posted by Chizabubble
*/me looks for italian babes in jeans $_$*
What about France? No 'If a woman is wearing a skirt, it's not rape.' comment?
i guess that if she is not wearing a skirt, it's not a rape lol
otherwise, you better stay in italy ;p
I actual think that this is the more pressing issue. Women want equal jobs with equal pay but when it comes to accepting the same rules in society you don't see any women calling for equality. I'm personally sick of bullshit like this. It's either women are equal in all parts of life, courts included, or they stop bitching about not making equal pay or whatever. This doesn't mean that I'm against womens rights because I'm all for them, but women should except the ills of society that men have to deal with or they shouldn't receive all of the benefits.Originally Posted by mudd00000000
Yeah, tell me about it. The day a male employee can sue his boss for sexual harassment is the day where we can claim that there is equality within sexes. Unless the boss is hot. Then it's a liasion.
what exactly are we discussing about? isn't it about how marital rape supposed to be in different(read:lower) level than general rape?
about the issue on woman's emancipation going ambiguous, why not make it a different thread? that would really kick off...... u got one supporter already..
back to the topic, i think it SHOULD be on the same level. rape is rape. i agree with the judge. what should be fixed is how the committee sees the problem. judges should differ between woman using sex as her weapon and woman getting forced to sex.
btw, i think i've seen some episodes on this stuff in ally mcbeal..
Everybody needs a bosom for a pillow... mine's on the '45
Maybe it should, and maybe it shouldent, but you cant deny the fact that; if you place martial rape on the same level as all other, then any woman can merely say, "I was raped", and cops come running like a track team.
And as for the france thing...maybe I should buy plane tickets eh.
*No Error Squad
*Lost In The Blue
who was it that said "it's not rape.. it's suprise sex" ??? hmmm.. i honestly dont know.. but if my husband raped me i wouldnt go to the police id just hit him with a lamp and get a divorce.. i dont think its the same but i could be wrong because i only know the relationship i have with my husband
Are you DORK enough?
LOVELY_NIGHTMARE..I love Will and Chris!!
Abducting and gang-raping someone is only worse than marital rape in the sense that abduction constitutes an additional immoral act. I wouldn't call any of those much worse than the other, because both are completely immoral acts anyway.Originally Posted by Sherman
Of course she doesn't have to raise any forceful objection. Why should she? If one party says that he or she doesn't want to continue then the other party is morally and legally obliged to stop.Originally Posted by Sherman
Again, if she wants to quit, then her husband must respect that wish.Originally Posted by Sharman
Why shouldn't they? Is it somehow less immoral to rape your wife?Originally Posted by Sherman